FRED'S HOMEPAGE: Organizations

HUMAN RIGHTS SHOULD BE THE MAIN SUBJECT

Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:07:42 GMT

I found this statistical article in swedish translation in the swedish newspaper ”Sekotidningen” published in Nr 4 week 17, 1999. The article was copied from the page The Web of Culture, www.webofculture.com . I searched there later but I could not any longer find the original. Now I translated it with my bad English.

THE EARTH AS A VILLAGE OF 1OO INHABITANTS.
This statistic is a few years old, but the circumstances are still almost the same.

Quotation: ”...If we all on earth lived in a little village with 100 inhabitants, should exist: 21 Europeans, 57 Asians, 14 Americans, 8 Africans, 52 women, 48 men, 70 persons with different body color than white, 70 persons with other religion than Christian, 89 heterosexuals, 11 homosexuals, 70 analphabetic. The half of the inhabitants should be underfed and 59% of all resources should belong to 6 persons and all 6 should be citizens of USA. 1 person should have university education and 1 person should own a computer.

”Human Rights in the ancient world", is the name of en article in Wikipedia. I wanted to know more about Human Rights and searched in the Wikipedia. Here comes the article:

Quotation: "Ur-Nammu, king of Ur in ca. 2050 BC created the Code of Ur-Nammu, the oldest legal codex that survives today. Several other sets of laws were created in Mesopotamia including the Code of Hammurabi (ca. 1780 BC), one of the best preserved examples of this type of document. It shows rules, and punishments if those rules are broken, on a variety of matters including women's rights, children's rights and slave rights.

The prefaces of these codes invoked the Mesopotamian gods for divine sanction. Societies have often derived the origins of human rights in religious documents. The Vedas, the Bible, the Qur'an and the Analects of Confucius are some of the oldest written sources that address questions of people's duties, rights, and responsibilities."

One can read a lot about human rights there. Some articletitles are: Human rights, Human rights sources, The United Nations, Europe, History of human rights, Human rights in the ancient world (copied above), Persian Empire, Maurya Empire, Early Islamic Caliphate, Human rights in early modern era, After world war II, International bodies, Regional legislation, Philosophy of human rights, Theory of value and property, Types, Justification of human rights, Criticism of human rights, Human rights violations, National human rights institutions, and links to about another 200 similar articles.

Human rights are basic for the foundation of the international direct it-democratic organization.

The representative democratic political culture and the media culture, has trade, commerce, economy and money as main subject in the world of today. They should have human rights instead. It is inhuman to don't do enough for materialistic equality and for our many starving and hard suffering brothers and sisters in the world.

Fighting starvation and supporting basic education for all,

is an obligation not a charity.

Fred Blomson

fred.blomson@homail.com

www.fredblomson.spaces.live.com

www.itdemokrati.blogspot.com

www.blogg.aftonbladet.se/20300

www.superstart.se, världens bästa gratis startsida.

DIRECTDEMOCRATIC EDUCATION IN THE MAIN PROGRAM

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:39:28 GMT

The local and the global direct democratic improvements has to develop hand by hand. One of the basic conditions is the education on all the levels. It seems that it is quite difficult to influence and to engage the voters of today to start to use computers and to participate as me and you do. It will be easier for the coming generations who learn early in the schools to use computers. Unfortunate the subject direct democracy is not yet a school subject and not yet a branch for university studies and much research.

The financial establishment and their followers, are afraid to loose their privileges and does not support and improve direct democracy in the schools, in the media and everywhere in the society. We have to be very well conscious about the basic and fundamental meaning of the direct democratic education and to take up this discussion in all the main programs.

Fred Blomson

fred.blomson@homail.com

www.fredblomson.spaces.live.com

www.enomodemokrati.blogspot.com

www.blogg.aftonbladet.se/20300

www.superstart.se, världens bästa gratis startsida.

NO LEADER FOR THE WORLDFEDERATION

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:38:34 GMT

Some day a good friend asked me:"Who would you like to see as leader of a future earthfederation?" I am very thankfull for this question and I was surprised because for me it is very obvious who I would like to see as leader of a future earth federation. I understand that many people of the medium- and highclass today could answer "The president of the USA". My answer is: "myself" of course or, "nobody" of course. My explanation is that the federation does not need any leader. I would like to know argumentation about the needing of a leader.

Many animals are organised in groups with a leader. We are also animals, but we are also something more than animals. We are equipped betheen other, with the ability of constructive critical thinking.

Let us focus on the structure of the family which is the minimal groupcell of the society and has been unchanged since humans lived like animals.

The structure of the family today is still strog related to heredity, personal property and the childrens big economical dependence from the parents concerning nutrition, advanced education and more.

It is a part of our culture, the structure of the family and all the human structures of today, to look like a pyramid with a "Pater familias" on the top.

The great majority of the earthpopulation today has nothing to inherite, not enough to eat and they are analphabets. In a modern democratic system without inheritance (forbitten by democratic grass-root law), all obeys the modern democratic law and not the moneyowners. There exists not a pyramidal structure and any leader is not needed.

Many people today hate the State because the State takes their money by scraping taxes. In

the modern democratic system the term State is replaced by the term Law.

The Law takes no taxes because the law owns everything. The worldcitizens own only as much they need to live a comfortable life. If they are sick or have special needs, the Law has paragraphs for all the situations.

Socialists, communists, leftpeople and similar organisations has tried to better the society before the introduction of the informationtechnology and the internet. The trials ended with dictatorship and catastrophe. The main mistake was the nondemocratic structure. They never understood that they had to replace the pyramidal structure beginning from the family and upwards, with the grass-root democracy and the Law.

The State was controlled by the party, the party was controlled by the central committee and the central committee was controlled by the general secretary and partyleader... In our worldfederation everything is controlled by the grass-roots means their Law.

Hereby I propose a votation to eliminate the word "leader" from the vocabulary of the worldfederation because it is a very dangerous word connected and related only to the conception dictatorship. The word leader is not to be misstaken with word teacher.

Fred Blomson (In the pic with daughter Marina)

fred.blomson@homail.com